branch-review

Takes stock of what a branch actually changed, before it gets pushed — works out the scope itself, then lays the change out group by group in one pass: files touched, what was done and why, how, and what deserves a second look, quoting code only where a remark needs it rather than reprinting the diffs. Closes on a single question set so the user steers without wading through hunks, and can then file the fixes decided along the way into the commits they belong to, via fixup and autosquash. Use it whenever someone wants to find out what happened on their own unmerged work — "relis ma branche", "on repasse sur mes commits", "vérifier ce que j'ai fait hier soir", "qu'est-ce que j'ai changé au juste sur cette branche", "fais le point avant que je pousse", "repasser sur ce que j'ai fait avant de demander une revue", "check my work before I open the MR/PR", "walk me through my changes" — including when the code was produced fast with an assistant and they no longer know what is in there, when they only name a commit range, a path, or a branch, and when they have uncommitted fixes to read through and then tidy into the right commits. Reach for it rather than answering with a bare git diff or an off-the-cuff recap — what is wanted is an account they can steer from. Skip when they hand over a single file or snippet and want an automated findings report, and skip for a security-only audit — Claude Code ships `security-review` for that one.